←Blanked the page
Okumaya devam et...
← Previous revision | Revision as of 23:47, 28 April 2024 |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| ('''B''') "How is the strength of the entity being measured?": which immediately raises a number of concerns: | |
| * To what extent is the attribute being measured (e.g., self-esteem) related to the concept ("ego-strength") under scrutiny? | |
| * To what extent is the attribute being measured (e.g., self-esteem) an index of the concept ("ego-strength") under scrutiny?<ref>According to Viswanathan (2005, pp.5-10), the "conceptual distance" between an abstract/concrete concept (e.g., length being a concrete concept) and its measurement has a direct bearing on the reliability and veracity of that measurement; and, further, he notes, although "they can be [productively] used to theorize", "constructs [that] are too abstract", such as "Freud’s concepts of id and superego may not be directly measurable" (p.6).</ref> | |
| * To what extent is the before- and after-intervention ratings of the attribute being measured (e.g., self-esteem) an index of the comparative values of the concept ("ego-strength") under scrutiny? |
Okumaya devam et...